Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Damien Wenger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Almeida vs Wenger analysis and find out who is favored!
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Damien Wenger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Almeida 1 - 1 Wenger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Almeida has won 47.84% of points on their second serve, while Wenger has won 51.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Almeida, in recent form, has won 50.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wenger has won 56.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.14% and 38.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Almeida has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wenger has saved 55.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Almeida has won 45.65% of matches played (W/L 21/ 25), with Wenger winning 63.51% (W/L 47/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Almeida has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 154/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Wenger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 244/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Almeida has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.24% of matches (W/L 19/ 23), where as Wenger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 34/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Almeida winning 1 times and Wenger being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Almeida winning 2 and Wenger winning 2. The last match between Almeida and Wenger was at the Piracicaba Challenger, 30-01-2024, First, Clay with Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:48:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Almeida and Wenger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Almeida winning 0 times and Wenger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Almeida winning 0, and Wenger 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Almeida has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.24 while Wenger has played against players with an average rank of 246.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Almeida has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wenger has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Almeida has converted 48.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wenger has converted 48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
330
Rank
190
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
400
Rank
363
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
59% (176-122)
Career Total W/L
64% (255-142)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$57,890
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Damien Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:48:15 | 0:48:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (31/56) | 63% (33/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (20/31) | 58% (19/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 37% (7/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (26/52) | 41% (23/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Damien Wenger
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(3) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Damien Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (24/17) | 59% (39/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (207/185) | 55% (336/279) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 60% (18/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 24 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 94 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:4 | 1:53:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.67 | 292.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (827/1337) | 62% (1235/1996) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (556/827) | 63% (784/1235) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (244/510) | 51% (386/761) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (59/122) | 49% (117/238) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (539/1274) | 45% (900/1994) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (8/6) | 61% (11/7) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 21% (14/3) |
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
44
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Liam Draxl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
41%
(
28 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Andrea Collarini
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Damien Wenger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Damien Wenger
74%
(
83 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
85 of
135)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
53 of
85)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
59 of
135)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Johan Nikles
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Toprak Avcibasi
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Damien Wenger
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Damien Wenger
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
55 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Rocco Piatti
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Damien Wenger
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Niccolo Ciavarella
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
31 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Almeida Vs Wenger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
